24h購物| | PChome| 登入
2011-03-16 23:34:26 | 人氣779| 回應16 | 上一篇 | 下一篇

Gramophone文摘:Philip Kennicott談巴哈夏康

推薦 0 收藏 0 轉貼0 訂閱站台

上周五我在誠品買下二月份的Gramophone,為的是封面人物Franz Liszt--今年是他兩百周年誕辰紀念,故特別為他做了封面故事。從那之後心裡醞釀著打算寫一篇「為何人人不愛李斯特」的文章,東西很多,然無奈每到下手就作罷。

李斯特之外,這本Gramophone許多文章非常精彩,其中一篇專欄,由Washington Post的專欄作家Philip Kennicott執筆,此次主題是寫他聽Bach's Choconne。由於作者寫出了我對音樂寫作的期待,當下讀完便想拿此文做為讀者服務,但或許因為雜誌出刊時間太近,也可能本人網路搜尋功夫太糟,我找不到此文任何的網路檔案,最後決定採取最原始的打字方式,轉刊此文,以饗大眾。

我是沒那才掉轉翻成中文,以及文中對於音樂的形容、比喻和描述,得用英文才夠精緻,故此文以英文呈現,大家隨意取用。

打完之後,Feltsman彈Chopin Noctunes也結束了,剛好。

*************************************************************************************************

標題:When grief is as engulfing as a tidal wave, Bach's Chaconne provides the only solace.

In the other room my mother is dying.

Underneath a great pile of sheets and coverlets, her once formidable presence is reduced to two hands and an ashen face, her breath labored and her eyes remote and teary. She’s almost gone, the nurses say, and everything that mattered about her—the voice, the temper, the delight in small things—has preceded her into nothingness.

For the past few days, the only music I can tolerate is Bach’s Chaconne in D minor for solo violin, the sprawling fantasy on a simple, descending theme that concludes the Partita No. 2. Why does everything else seem so insipid, so irrelevant? There are other monumental works by Bach that might be pressed into service, the Goldberg Variations, the Cello Suites. But the former seem too busy, too much of the dance to serve a mind that is blank and listless. The latter, for some reason, feel exhausted to me, perhaps because I put them to work the last time the Grim Reaper called and now they sound hollowed out and dry.

There are some who believe the Chaconne was Bach’s memorial to his 1st wife, but that speculation doesn’t interest me at the moment. Music that is explicitly about the death often seems trivial in the face of death itself. Manon dying (“Sola, perduta, abbandonata”) feels false and overwrought. If anyone in the house made that kind of noise now, I’d show them the door. Bach’s Chaconne may be a commanding sonic display, testing the limits of the instrument, but it also feels intimate and quiet.

I think in all of opera, the only death that feels remotely familiar is that of Prince Andrei, in Prokofiev’s War and Peace. And it’s not an accurate picture of death, but the suffering and struggle during that last, luminal phrase of life. Perhaps Parsifal’s anguished cry upon learning from Kundry of the death of his mother has truth to it too, but it’s a moment of truth in four hours of feverish fantasy that has nothing to do with the spirit of my family’s house today.

My mother played the violin, so it’s possible that’s the reason the Chaconne is so vital at this moment. But she never played the violin the way Sergey Khachatryan plays it and she wasn’t partial to Bach. It was Khachatryan’s set of the Bach Partitas and Sonatas that I grabbed, in a vacant moment, thinking perhaps there’d be time to listen to something in the car or on the headphones during the hours and days—no one can ever tell you how long—of the vigil. And I’m glad I did.

Khachatryan will probably want to record these works again. And when he does, my guess is that he’ll focus more intently on the contrapuntal character of the music, on the illusion of a chorus of violins summoned from a single instrument. But there is a lot to admire in this young man’s reading, which is surprisingly gentle and tender, always returning from grand gestures to a home place of sweetness. His Adagio from the Sonata No 3 begins far away, quiet and searching, a powerful layering of tentative ideas. He seems happiest in the slow movements—or am I most attuned to them? Certainly there’s no slighting his technique, which is never taxed, even in the huge chords, skips and whirlwind figuration of the Chaconne.

Khachatryan’s whispering pianissimo at the beginning of the middle section, in D major, breaks my heart. Bach built in this piece in three parts, the middle turning to a major key. Khachatryan plays it as if delicately stroking a beloved face, or remembering a private, sustaining scene from childhood.

Some of the chemicals that modern medicine pours into ailing bodies result in, among other side effects, an increase in sensitivity to sounds. My mother, whose superhuman hearing enabled her to command the entire house, to detect from the depths of a deep sleep the sound of the refrigerator door opening, grew agitate and irritable at music that was too loud. Near the end of her life, she liked the “Meditation” from Thais and not much else. I think I might have changed her mind about Bach if I had played her this passage from Khachatryan’s performance. But that’s one of the many things that death eliminates the sharing of music.

It’s easy to build too much philosophy into the music of Bach and the Chaconne, with its thrilling diversity built over what is one of the simplest descending motifs in music, is rich in metaphorical possibilities. As have many others over the almost 300 years of the life of this music, I hear mortality in its repeating line, a reminder of the inevitable trajectory of every life. And in everything else, the 63 variations built on top and around it, I hear life, variety and invention. All of life is here, including death, and in that D major passage that Khachatryan plays so eloquently, life and death come together into a single, acceptable, manageable fact of existence.

Grief renders one temporarily allergic to silliness and banality of the world, the smiling weatherman with shiny teeth, the idiotic billboards advertising things people don’t need, the pop songs and inane comedies and empty politicians spouting their populist gibberish. Most season’s of the year I am happy to hear Bach’s Chaconne, but I don’t search it out. For a time now, and I don’t know how long, its main service is to provide a cocoon, shutting out the stupidity of the world. There is, in fact, very little music that is as deep as life itself, perhaps only a handful of pieces, which is why it is wise to reserve them for when they’re needed.
 

台長: orangebach
人氣(779) | 回應(16)| 推薦 (0)| 收藏 (0)| 轉寄
全站分類: 社會萬象(時事、政論、公益、八卦、社會、宗教、超自然) | 個人分類: music |
此分類下一篇:Melody at Night, with You
此分類上一篇:我的一廂情願

Val
I found my heart resonated with the flow of emotion

exhibited from the article while reading it, and it was so

touching. The structure of the article is like a tightly

wound set of variations, or a Chaconne to be more exact,

where a underlying theme always persists, sorrow but

elegant. Bach's Chaconne comes live and takes shape of the

memory of loved ones, or life itself.



Love it, thank you!
2011-03-17 01:11:53
orangebach
不客氣。



到一家餐廳倘若永遠只吃單一主廚做出來的菜色,也是挺無聊的,

也是需要不同的客座主廚出現,比較一新耳目囉。

這也是本人堅持偶爾要來些讀者服務的緣故。



我重讀一遍,這篇文章真是超讚吧?

有深度卻不濫情,音樂最吸引人的地方其實仍然在於跟人之間的關連--至少我如此

以為。同樣的音樂放在不同聽者的脈絡情境下,才有獨一無二的動人時刻。



應該會買Sergey Khachatryan的這版本來試一試,至少放在片單裡面。



我也查過MDT和Amazon了,雖然MDT在特價,但Amazon便宜許多,順帶提供你,以

及其他有興趣的人參考:



●這是MDT:

http://www.mdt.co.uk/MDTSite/product//V5181.htm



●這是Amazon:

http://www.amazon.com/Bach-Sonatas-Partitas-Violin-

Khachatryan/dp/B0038KUZI6/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1300322530&sr=8-

1



●這是Amazon的試聽,31軌都有30秒左右的試聽:



http://www.amazon.com/gp/recsradio/radio/B0038KUZI6/ref=pd_krex_d

p_001_021?ie=UTF8&track=021&disc=001
2011-03-17 09:00:34
ARWEN
今天我剛好也聽了夏康,但是是布索尼改編的,拉羅佳彈的,很動人。最近,夏康這個曲子真是跟

我有緣,尤其是費雪的夏康。



提博的夏康拉得蕩氣迴腸,我不知道這適不適合這曲子,但是聽完後,久久難以自己。



好友大羅一直說李斯特不會讓人記得,而蕭邦會。我最近卻一直回到李斯特。這兩天聽波雷彈的,

真是好。
2011-03-17 22:09:15
orangebach
我非常喜歡拉蘿家,她彈的夏康很優美。

不知你是否聽過米開蘭傑利彈的BUSONI這首曲子,其實我更喜歡這個版本。

Rosel也有彈這曲子,就他一貫的調調。



不過我想是我偏見,這首曲子還是小提琴拉起來比較到味。一些高音部分,好比一

開始,或者到後段,鋼琴就是隔靴搔癢。



你說的費雪,Julia Fisher?我有她的Pagnini,沒有他的巴哈。

老實說這首曲子,小提琴,我最喜歡海飛茲(笑);海飛茲拉的巴哈我個人感覺很

糟,兩人不對盤,獨獨Chaconne特優。Milstein很棒,可是我覺得情緒好像內斂

了些,不夠爽快。



基本上我同意大羅的話,的確李斯特難以留下記憶,而蕭邦可以,這是寫作的限制

和風格所致。算我食古不化,李斯特我仍投阿勞一票;波雷是李斯特名盤耶。另外

最近有個老法,Marc-Andre Hamelin,跟Feltsman一樣留平頭,看起來很性格,

他有幾張Liszt,我應該會來試試看。



Hyparion有不少Liszt,包括有Stephen Hough, Demidenko也有,還有上述的

Hamelin,今年Leslie Howard更錄了李斯特全集--99張。



徐志摩不是說嗎,你記得也好,最好你忘掉,在這交會時互放的光亮。那無論記得

會忘掉,李斯特都還是有他獨特的光亮。



對了,你似乎對《1Q84》很喜歡,建議看看「《1Q84》之後 ~」特集,裡面或可可

以呼應/解釋你所提過的「書寫即救贖」。
2011-03-17 22:47:03
ARWEN
我說的夏康是其他人的夏康,我最近迷的是韓德爾與卡士伯費雪的夏康。



李斯特的唱片其實我還不少,阿勞我有一整套,還有其他人彈的,但是到現在還是會去買心的李斯特來聽,不像蕭邦,有幾

個版本後就停買了(不過幾說是幾個其實還是不少個),大概因為蕭邦聽多了,容易記,就像是流行歌旋律,一旦記住,我就

會失去興趣。李斯特這種容易忘掉的特性剛好適合我。我因為己乎不聽CD,所以就只有"老大師"的錄音可以聽,但是即使如

此,往往還是有很多可以買。對於一個玩音響的人來說,李斯特比蕭邦多了一點優勢,那就是音響越好,聽得越爽,越能了

解李斯特的好處。



我會去買一本,事實上,第三集我還沒買來看,原因是還有其他書在看,每天工作累到半死卻還要抽時間寫。1Q84算是村上

小說裡我比較喜歡的,但不是最喜歡的,比較上,我更喜歡他的中短篇,長篇的大概就國境之南,喜歡的原因多半跟個人生

命經驗有關,倒不是他的文筆有多好。不過這句話該有保留,因為看譯本不該做這樣子的結論。



書寫能不能救贖我不知道,照有些西方人的說法,女人是男人的救贖,死亡是愛情的救贖,所以我看到救贖這詞會怕的。對

我來說,書寫即治療,因為我的心需要一個出口,然後所有的情緒有個去處,像壞血需要被導出體外一樣。
2011-03-18 12:07:05
orangebach
啊,抱歉,引用錯,你提到的是「書寫即治療」,不是救贖。

這本特集,很特別,我覺得資訊價值勝於可讀性。我對了解作家的想法向來好奇,這是我買的原

因。



至於蕭邦跟李斯特,你的說法很有趣,似乎是從音響的角度切入,李比蕭贏面大,這是其一,其二

是他的曲比較難記,不致於膩。或許可以寫些什麼表達你對他的看法。



坦白說你這兩點,第一個我想到的是Prokofiev,其次是Shostakovich&Stravinsky。
2011-03-18 17:24:38
Deadlockcp
(like)...



very touching and eloquently written...

providing a unique entry point and perspective to the piece of

music.



makes me wonder, what piece of music right now would bring

solace to me if a close family member is slowly dying?
2011-03-18 17:27:08
Deadlockcp
這是一個可能性。

不過獨自一人時,說不定有別的音樂能給予更大的慰藉~~~



不知為什麼,腦中出現一幕,是探病的人在醫院陪病床上的人聽他最喜歡

的Aerosmith鬼吼鬼叫,然後回到家裡,放入Barber的Adagio for

Strings....



Anyways... 我常上Gramophone的網頁,但似乎太新的issue,不會放在網

路上,要是有paid subscription才能看到。因此,現在只看得到去年(還

有之前)的刊。
2011-03-19 00:47:15
Val
李斯特也許比蕭邦還難解,我一直想不通為什麼寫出巡禮之年的人也寫了grand

galop chromatic和匈牙利狂想曲。Marc-Andre Hamelin的指功應該算天下無

雙,但我對他的李斯特和蕭邦都有一點保留意見。我喜歡有心的李斯特,但他挑的

李斯特曲目卻幾乎只需要用手,不太需要心。我非常喜歡他的Godowsky和

Alkan,他自己作曲的一組練習曲非常驚人,Villa-Lobos那張極盡精彩,聽他

現場彈德布希前奏曲更是難忘的經驗。他對結構動態音色掌握的技術讓人敬畏,但

有時會有點懷疑他的心在哪裡。



Deadlockcp:

如果真碰到這種事,也許會完全沒心情聽任何音樂。如果我有大量空白的時間,除

了巴哈,我很可能會去聽華格納,或許崔斯坦伊索笛。
2011-03-19 23:18:29
orangebach
To Deadlockcp,



如果是獨自一人,我可能也會選擇甚麼都不聽;如果要聽,應該是聽與對方有關連

的曲子。其實你這問題就好像我媽叫我預測明天股市漲還跌道理相同,我哪知道我

到時候想聽甚麼?也有可能選擇寫一篇文章啊。。。



至於Gramophone,我覺得還是看到紙本雜誌感受最好。雖然很難跟周遭的人分享,

不過打字也是練習耐心的方式之一,所以我想說不定日後還會繼續來做讀者服務。
2011-03-20 21:00:31
orangebach
To Val,



你提出一個很有趣的角度:就是李斯特的心與手。這是個值得思考和探討的問題,

或許之後你會有些甚麼心得再與我們分享。我完全同意你的看法,但是要有心有手

的李斯特演奏,實在非常稀少,這也是我懶得一直找的緣故,畢竟李斯特並不悅

耳,而多數都有手無心,甚至無心無手,失敗機率很高啊。



至於那個類Feltsman的老法Hamelin,我壓根沒聽過,今年或許會弄個一兩張來

聽,好比巡禮之年--其實對他的蕭邦我也滿好奇。他最近或者是即將,要發一張有

B小調的李斯特曲子,不曉得是否可以有心一點。
2011-03-20 21:07:22
Deadlockcp
我丟的問題其實就是rhetorical跟open-ended,我自己也不知道答案,沒

回答,也沒期待大家太認真回答~~~ 哈 :) 只是念到文章作者在傖促

之間隨手一抓,原本也是無心的,但結果產生的共鳴還有力量之大,音樂

powerful的地方正在此,就在那個不經意之間~~~



My two cents on Liszt:



Liszt的鋼琴音樂,又提到Leslie Howard的那個全集,在當初在出的時

候,我陸續買了幾張。結論是只能當做是百科全書吧,因為不管彈法和音

樂,也都沒留下特別的印象,所以我也是「蕭邦掛」的吧。



事實上,讓我印象最深刻的,應該是他的交響詩吧。他orchestration的

本領,以及為交響樂團寫曲子的掌握,使得後來忘記哪個人說,Liszt並

不只是a good composer for piano works, but a good composer,

period...
2011-03-21 01:47:16
orangebach
我會建議再多聽一些人的李斯特,再下結論。Leslie Howard的李斯特大全集,我

看來是個人致敬的意涵大過藝術表達,是否因此而無留下深刻印象,倒是值得商

榷。又或者,如樓上所言,李斯特的旋律原本就是難以記住的?這其中變數甚多,

很難歸因於個別因素。



再如另個樓上所言,好的李斯特有心有手,有手無心的李斯特或心不及手的李斯特

屬絕大多數,所以要找到個人心目中有心有手的李斯特,實在得花一番力氣了,尤

其加上旋律並不可親。不過,如果你找到,終究還是會覺得值得,因為李斯特絕非

你現在聽到的那付樣子。



我個人仍然偏愛他的鋼琴作品勝過他的交響詩,你說的orchestration本領,在單

一樂器上更有可觀之處。
2011-03-22 10:30:27
Deadlockcp
的確是這樣。有時候「名曲」之外曲子的錄音,變數很多。可以是曲子本

身,也可以是演奏者。小澄清一下,說「沒留下印象」,是指Leslie

Howard錄那些其他相對冷門的音樂,不是廣泛地指Liszt全部的音樂。通

常會想錄這種大全集的人,少不了一些學者的氣質。偏偏,音樂學者,不

一定是最適任詮釋的音樂家。所以,若我要收集,動機會是來當一套百科

全書,而喜歡的音樂,會再特地去買單獨的錄音~~



至於他的交響詩,他在鋼琴上所能譜出的東西當然是沒話說。為何特別提

到orchestration本領(這兒一詞指的specifically是將音樂譜給交響樂

團),我常常喜歡提起兩個極端的例子:Schumann和Tchaikovksy。前者鋼

琴作品見長,但其orchestration能力普遍看法是不及他的鋼琴曲(這個說

法近來有不同的論點,但大致上的印象是如此),而Tchaikovksy能在交響

樂團製造出的效果,是被公認的,但他的鋼琴曲,少了仗著樂器種類音

色,大多曲子也沒他的管絃樂有特色。以Liszt的鋼琴作品產量,更勝

Schumann許多倍,但為交響樂團所寫的曲子,至少以我而言,顛覆了之前

的印象和期待。(當然,他前幾首得到了Joachim Raff不少的幫助,但之

後幾首,卻是Liszt自己所譜~~~ )



扯那麼多,我也同意要認識Liszt,仍然是從他的鋼琴曲下手,所以其實

咱看法並無太大不同啦。目前手邊喜歡或是較為有名的Liszt鋼琴曲的錄

音都算滿意啦,但待日後要認真接觸其他曲子,欲尋得其他推薦的詮釋版

本,再和orangebach,Val,Arwen,及Mingus幾位樂友請教~~~
2011-03-22 11:56:17
Val
剛收到Sergey Khachatryan / Bach,我覺得和這篇Gramophone的文章很像,

是有格調而不濫情的演奏,處理得很細膩,動態對比與音色都很傑出。我覺得他把

音色和聲部對比當做第一優先,在無法兼顧時寧可放棄速度的一致性,而他的感情

就全放在強弱音對比和運弓的飽滿,有點內斂,像工筆畫,不是潑墨寫意。他的弱

音和慢速運弓處理得極好,以我對小提琴粗淺的了解,能把弱音拉得溫柔而飽滿,

應該很不容易。錄音相當不錯,是比較近距離的錄法,能清楚聽到小提琴家的呼吸

聲。



聽音樂常需要緣份,在正常情況下我幾乎不可能會去買這套CD。好的巴哈演奏很

難得,每個遇合都是恩賜。
2011-03-23 09:09:14
orangebach
我也買了這張,還有一 張Shostakovich還是Sibelius。但要四月底才會收到。



之前聽了試聽,夏康咋聽之下速度較慢但音色飽滿。



的確如果不是這篇文章,根本不會注意到此人。是機緣,沒錯。
2011-03-23 10:18:09
是 (若未登入"個人新聞台帳號"則看不到回覆唷!)
* 請輸入識別碼:
請輸入圖片中算式的結果(可能為0) 
(有*為必填)
TOP
詳全文