24h購物| | PChome| 登入
2013-04-13 10:43:54 | 人氣1,730| 回應9 | 上一篇 | 下一篇

有關Keith Jarrett的Pari/London Testament

推薦 0 收藏 0 轉貼0 訂閱站台

聽音樂總是一陣一陣。

某段時間因為因緣巧合,便會特別投入某種音樂,我總像個貪吃成癮的小孩,非要每天吃、吃很多很多、吃很久,直到某一天,才會突然有「夠了」的鬧鈴響起,然後才逐漸轉到別的音樂上去,彷彿要把之前聽得那許多,全部忘掉。再隔一陣子,如果又轉回先前那吃到過飽的音樂上,通常此時才會體會出之前聽得是甚麼,跟我產生了甚麼關係等等,一切才會清楚起來。

今年至今,扣除馬勒,聽最多的便是Keith Jarrett。尤其過年以後,事情、壓力的挑戰很大,身體精神的負擔彷彿沉甸甸到某種我快無法負荷的程度,結果兩個禮拜前便爆發成重感冒;這一大段過程中,平常最常聽得進的就是Keith Jarrett的音樂。常跟朋友戲稱,音樂人生總有聽高級輕音樂(easy-listening)的必要,如果100%都是古典音樂,一切也都太緊繃、太僵固了;Jarrett的音樂就是我的高級輕音樂。至於Jarrett的音樂是否能算高級輕音樂,見仁見智,我的心得是,某些曲子是,某些曲子不是,精神萎靡不振時是,精神正襟危坐時不是,三重奏比較是,而鋼琴獨奏比較不是。

過年時買的Jarrett錄音,巴黎/倫敦現場(Paris/London Testament)是個評價非常高的現場錄音,日期分別在2008年11月26日的巴黎和12月1日的倫敦。我自己聽完也很印象深刻,是一個狂亂即興和沉靜哲思相當平衡的現場組合,既不會亂到不知所以然,也不會靜到屏息呼不過來,尤其倫敦現場中幾首收尾的曲子,給人一種「看開了」、「了然於胸」的感受。事後我讀了CD裡Jarrett自己寫的CD內頁,才發現原來這兩個現場其實在他人生中扮演著特殊的角色,原文如下,以饗大眾。

我深知並不是所有人都聽爵士樂,聽爵士樂也未必接觸過Keith Jarrett,接觸過Keith Jarrett也未必對此人留下深刻印象,對此人留下深刻印象也未必聽過Paris/London Testament。總之,與大家分享,但是倒也不用勉強接受,也沒必要馬上去買這套CD,畢竟每人口味、習性、思考回路都不同,所以....好自為之了。

" Still crazy after all these years"

Since Heidelberg, Germany in the early 70's I have done improvised piano solo concerts. It all started, however, back when I was a six-or-seven-year-old so-called "child prodigy," studying and playing classical recitals for the Allentown Pa. Women's club, etc. The program would usually include masters such as Mozart or Schubert, Chopin or Debussy, but would also include something I "wrote". But this "writing" wasn't executed at all the same each time. Almost nothing was written down on paper. There were motifs and melodies that remained the same, but then around these were "takeoffs" in the same mood. The pieces were almost always "program" music. There was "Jungle Suite", for example. When I would be practicing at home, I would often change the notes of some composer, and my mother would catch this at times. I told her not to worry: I would play it a written at the concert.

Heidelberg was a university town and had a jazz festival. I started my part of the evening be playing a tune, but somehow did not stop. Instead, I connected the tune to the next one by continuing on some sort of journey or transition to it. So, by the end of the set, I hadn't stopped playing. I was then merried to my first wife, Margot.

Over the years since then, solo piano concerts became more "abstract" and somehow they would grow from small seeds planted spontaneously at the beginning. But they still lasted the entire 45 minutes or so, then a break, the another 45 minutes. They were kind of epic journeys into the unknown. The architecture, however, over many years, became too predictable to me, and I stopped doing so many of these and concentrated on my quartets and writing.

After my divorce from Margot, I lived for 30 years with my second wife, Rose Anne. I attempted everal times to re-invent the solo concerts, but among other things was laid low for about two years with Chronic fatique syndrome. The amount energy of these concerts took was always amazing to me. It was like the Olympics each time. So there was a certain off-and-on quality to my scheduling them. While many incredible good cencerts came about, some were not recorded.

In the early part of the decade, I tried to bring the format back: starting from nothing and building a universe. But somehow, while practicing in my studio, I realized that much of what I was playing wa studd I had liked before, but actively did not like now. Whenever I would play something that was from the past and sounded mechanical, I would stop. This led me to try include thi starting and stopping in solo concerts in Japan. The music from this particular first attempt was to become "Radience".

I continued to find a wealth of music inside this open format, stopping whenever the muic told me to, and eventually released "The Carnegie Hall Concert" in 2006. Although I seemed to others to be some kind of freak of nature, the amount of preparation work, mental, physical and emotional is probably beyond anybody's imagination (including my own). It is NOT natural to sit at a piano, bring no material, clear your mind completly of musical ideas, and play something that is lasting value and brand new (not to mention that these are live concerts, and the audiences role was of utmost chemical importance: they could change the potential and shape of the music easier than the difference of pianos or hall sound). I then did a series of solo concerts in Japan in the spring of 2008 that seemed to hit a technical high-note in the hotory of my solo events. I wasn't sure what could possibly happen next after these concerts.

Then my wife left me (this was the third time in four years). I quickly scrambled to stay alive (music had been my life for 60 years) by setting up a Carnegie Hall Concert (a leaflet inserted into the program for my 25th anniversary trio concert there in Octobor 2008 advertied a solo concert in late January 2009), but before I did that concert, Steve Cloud managed to quickly come up with two solo concerts in Europe: Paris and London. I had not played solo in London, I believe, 18 years. These were the first solo events since my wife had left. I was in an incredibly vulnerable emotional state, but I admit to wondering whether this might not be a "good" thing for the music. It truly didn't matter; I had to do them. Everything was put together in a dizzying short time. I had to find help for packing and touring (I had lots of physical ailments that prevented me from being pro-active on the physical frones, plus stress, plus an emptiness that wa overwhelming, etc.). I decided that if I backed down now, I would back down forever. 

I used to tell my piano students, " if you're going to play, play like it's the last time." it was not theoretical advice anymore; this was either going to achieve my survival or hasten my demise. I have no idea how much energy I would have, though I prepared well (but all along I never remembered just how much it took to do these concerts.)

Startlingly, Paris was an achivement I never expected. Manfred Eicher and the rest of my touring ensemble (minus one) were backstage eating dinner. it started then to be clear to me that I had a new chance at something, that nothing would stop me if only I stayed awake to the poibilities, both muical and personal. Many of people I knew seemed to feel they were just meeting me. I was in tears going on and offstage for bows.

On the way into London, I had as close a brush with a nervous breaksown as I've had. Christmas shoppers were all out holding hands; the place was too colorful for my mood. I was exhausted from Paris (only two days had gone by) and stuck in an unmoving traffic jam in the middle of London in a car without my wife, looking out the window at couples, Christmasn lights, and seemingly-normal unbounded joy. I couldn't handle it. When we finally got to the room I closed all the curtains (they also looked out at lit up Christmas trees) and tried breathing normally.

Two days later we drove to the hall (the limo driver was on y side, he perked up my spirits), I checked the piano, went backstage to see what we had for dinner, was introduced to the catering lady, who was as sharp as anyone around and had just lost her lover after some time together. I said I couldn't help thinking about my wife, and she quietly (but firmly) pointed to a blank, white wall. We shot short, pointed one-liners back and forth during dinner, and I realized all these people, unwittingly, were helping me get myself together. 

The concert went on and, though the beginning was a dark, searching, multi-tonal melodic triumph, by the end it somehow became a throbbing, never-to-be-repeated, pulsing rock band of a concert (unless it was a church service, in which case, Hallelujah!) I needed heat therapy on my arms afterwards (first time ever). Even the people backstage as I came off in tears again were giving off the exactly right thing. Communication is all. Being is all. People are deep, serious creatures with little to hang on to.

So, loss may be a big thing, but what remains becomes even more important than ever. Just never let go of the thread. And be honest with yourself. A writer I greatly admore and with whom I was just recently in touch, echoed some of my words to her when she wrote back to me: "How fragile and serendipitous things are indeed, unbearably so."

    

台長: orangebach
人氣(1,730) | 回應(9)| 推薦 (0)| 收藏 (0)| 轉寄
全站分類: 社會萬象(時事、政論、公益、八卦、社會、宗教、超自然) | 個人分類: music |
此分類下一篇:對波里尼平均律改觀
此分類上一篇:Absolute Vodka

velvet
多謝回答之前問您有關Keith Jarrett的問題,我倒是還滿喜歡Rio那張,

有一種很不一樣,很不像Keith Jarrett的聆聽感受。另外那張郭德堡變奏

曲,或許是因為不是那麼習慣聽大鍵琴,聽了幾次之後便束之高閣了。







Blue Note那套超級棒,我發現在iTune裡,這套的聆聽次數竟然比科隆音

樂會還多得多!Sun bear全集一直無緣聽到,只記得當年在這套與Blue

Note那套間抉擇,不過好在現在ECM換了代理商,暫時不用怕買不到了。







另外去年挖出來的1979年日本巡迴現場雙CD,Sleeper,也給我一種很特別

的聆聽Keith Jarrett的不同感覺,因為長期以來,他的音樂給人的直覺感

受就是獨奏或三重奏,而這張雙CD專輯加入了薩克斯風的四重奏。







他的專輯中,我也有不推薦的,不過一時想不到(XDD)!想不到是因為聽了

之後不喜歡,擺久了也就忘了到底是哪幾張了。至於特別喜歡的,有

Always Let Me Go那張三重奏雙CD東京現場。Whisper Not那張也曾經

一聽再聽,雖然好一陣子沒聽了。卡內基廳現場我也滿喜歡,在裡面KJ特有

的踏步與呻吟,甚至進化成低聲嘶吼。







身邊沒有朋友喜歡KJ,甚至連聽爵士樂的好像也沒幾位。之前看到您提到喜

歡他,才很冒昧的請您推薦,以及問您是否有交換CD聽的習慣,實在很不好

意思啊!
2013-04-23 23:24:10
orangebach
我也發覺Keith Jarrett很少成為同好彼此或同好與我之間的話題,他們最多聽的就是科隆音樂會,不知

道為什麼,我猜因為跟黑人樂手比,他不夠hard core;跟白人樂手比,他又不夠鬆和fun(放)。或許跟古

典音樂背景有關,他的音樂其實是有種拘束性和往內收縮的,即興的程度永遠沒辦法有很寬廣的向度這讓他

的音樂滿不爵士的吧。



有點好奇你想跟我交換甚麼CD?

因為通常會想要借或者交換的,好像都是買不到的CD居多。而Jarrett的CD很少買不到,就連他早期錄的

第一張錄音都在Amazon上買得到。



我自己最喜歡的其實是La Scala,他在義大利史卡拉歌劇院的現場演奏,尤其最後一首Over the

Rainbow;平均律我不太推,我覺得他的平均律相當平淡而且乏味,可是他的韓德爾組曲和Shostakovich

前奏賦格相當不錯,我頗喜歡他彈古典音樂帶有些easy listening的調調,讓那些中規中矩的曲子聽起來

沒有那麼遙遠,但壞處是,聽起來會少一點高技巧的快感。



你提到他幾個東京現場,就我所知,他在東京的現場演奏超過一百五十次,應該是最愛在東京開演奏會的演

奏者之一,下一次我會買他在東京第一百五十場的現場演奏DVD。



Jarrett本身會十幾種樂器,他在二十多歲的時候學了很多種樂器,本來有陣子想要打鼓的,可是後來還是

回歸到鍵盤樂器上,有一張早期的錄音就是他自己演奏許多種樂器的爵士樂專集,後來因為賣得不好她就打

消念頭了。今年重發的Hymn/Sphere,他彈管風琴,有興趣你也可以試試看。



至於在台灣買Jarrett的錄音,我覺得站前大眾的貨比較多也齊全得多,偶爾也會進些特殊的東西,好比有

一次進Jarrett的文字作品集之類的。不過現在換代理,價格策略比從前硬,誠品會員也恕不折扣。
2013-04-24 08:23:57
無名稱
Barenboim的Wagner指環大戲有在你的規劃中嗎?
2013-04-25 04:10:45
orangebach
有這場嗎?我再去查查....

還沒有整個搜完,現在只看了兩家主要的音樂聽而已,

有些秋季節目還沒出來。



要看時間。

如果照我這樣切的話,剛好是落在整個十月

一個月已是我老闆容忍的極限吧....我猜的

所以超過這段時間我就沒辦法了。



如果可以的話,他是指環全部嗎?

我應會挑其中一個先來聽聽吧。其他再說。



不過如果沒有,我也會排一兩個歌劇來聽聽。

對耶,Coven Garden還沒看。
2013-04-25 07:23:54
orangebach
巴倫波音的全本指環是PROM的重頭戲

PROM每年在七月到九月

時間不對,我按照計畫要十月才會去倫敦。

所以聽不到囉。
2013-04-25 22:11:44
無名稱
BBC3

BBC3

BBC3...............
2013-04-27 05:29:17
velvet
對我來說,Keith Jarrett就是Keith Jarrett,很難跟其他爵士鋼琴家

做比較。我的意思並不是指他有多偉大,或者他的音樂有多好,好到其他爵

士鋼琴家無法與他比較。而是他呈現出來的音樂,非常的獨特,辨識度也很

高,有點像是Tom Waits給我的感覺一樣。







他的幾張古典專輯,我只有郭德堡那張,會買也純粹只是因為喜歡郭德堡變

奏曲。還是聽他彈屬於他自己的音樂比較習慣。







現在ECM換了代理,真的要買ECM的專輯,應該還是誠品音樂館會比較齊,只

是那邊不打折。許昌大眾有九五折的優惠,就算他們沒進,也還是可以請他

們幫忙訂。







之前換代理後價錢調漲,反而讓我狠下心,買了好多張跟之前代理商進的專

輯(不全是KJ),比較便宜。







您提到許昌大眾,想冒昧的請問,他們前陣子進的那套Sun bear全集,該不

會是您買走了吧?







在您另外一篇文章中提到交換CD,說真的當時是心血來潮,很開心的看到有

Keith Jarrett的同好,因此才那樣問您。當然現在他的CD不會不好買,

只是說有時候不知從何下手起,而且也不可能張張都買的情況下,才想說若

有彼此喜歡,而對方又剛好沒聽過的,在大家都方便的情況下,可以交換聽

聽看。
2013-05-18 00:18:17
orangebach
我的鍵盤壞了

U後面的英文字母打不出來

和長得跟T一樣的注音我也打不出來

所以一概是_

你只要看到_

就知道那代表U後面的英文字母啦



Sun Bear不是我買的,通常我買ECM都會拜託我classmate從美國帶回來給我



的確有時候很難知道究竟哪張比較好買

容易買錯

交換是個不錯的方式

你要還我喔 我可以跟你交換來聽聽

也說不定我有的你都有了



我周圍也沒有誰有比較多的KJ

所以以前我都是憑感覺、看封面

然後以Li_e為主

但是後來看了傳記之後(還沒看完)

我覺得根據傳記去買,會比較知到哪張錄音和不同Li_e錄音的意義

應該更好



最終極的方法 要不就是等哪天ECM缺錢

發KJ大全集

我自己是等不到那時候



目前應該省錢換電腦....
2013-05-20 09:05:03
velvet
看了傳記再買真是個之前沒想到過的好方法。



記得前兩年在某個網誌中,



看過描述策劃科隆音樂會的曲折過程,



之後再拿出來聽,就覺得又有了些新的感受,



若買了他本人的傳記,那麼感受可能會更強烈些。







有交換,一定是要還的,請放心,



若您不放心,我們用Dropbox交換檔案也可以(如果您有用的話),



只是這樣就沒辦法看到booklet了。



另外就算您的KJ專輯我都有了,這也不是個問題,



可以交換您覺得不錯,而我沒有的CD。







如果哪天ECM出了KJ大全集,



那麼對我來說,想必是個超級大掙扎吧...







至於交換方式,地點...等細節,



我想我們用email連絡?



如果okay的話,請您寄到 shihchenhung2002@yahoo.com



(最後沒有.tw)
2013-05-21 09:08:07
是 (若未登入"個人新聞台帳號"則看不到回覆唷!)
* 請輸入識別碼:
請輸入圖片中算式的結果(可能為0) 
(有*為必填)
TOP
詳全文