這是英文老師幫我上課的網路文章:
我們談論到生與死的問題。所謂未知生,焉知死。活著的人談論再多也不如自己死一回就明白了。但自己都死了,還能跟誰談?這是一個有趣的主題。也是一個神聖的主題。但是對很多人而言,它也是無聊的主題。但是,要練習講英文,並用英文去表達一些深刻的思考問題,於我而言就不是那麼簡單了。
在練習過程中,我告訴老師女兒見鬼的故事。引起老師的興趣,還問我還有沒有其他見鬼經驗?我又多說了女兒的另一個故事。
在表達的過程中,發現中文表達真快,英文就有點難度。但是,我已經盡力了。上完課,老師還寫了評論呢。我分享出來。
這是老師給我的評論:
|
|
Strengths
|
|
Areas for Improvement
|
|
Grammatical Accuracy
When you were telling me the story of what
happened with your daughter you said "this is my duaghter's story",
that was well said, you structured this sentence well.
Instead of saying "then I feel scared"
rather say "then I felt scared", I would like you to practice
talking about the past to help you use the rules of the past tense correctly.
|
|
Verbal Expression
I was pleased that you understood the article that
you read in class; you were prepared for today's lesson.
You learned the meaning of the word 'company' in
today's class; when you are with a person or people, or the person or people
you are with. Here are some examples of sentences that use the word
'company'; I just enjoy his company, It was a long journey and I was grateful
for his company, I enjoy my own company, I travelled in the company of two
teachers as far as Istanbul, I'd rather you didn't mention it when we're in
company. http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/british/company_2
|
|
Speech Clarity
I understood what you said in class, your tone was
clear.
In class you practiced pronouncing the word 'et
cetera'.
|
|
Confidence
I was pleased that you were able to tell me the story
about what happened with your daughter when she was very young.
I would like you to practice using the words that
you learned in today's class.
|
|
Topic Range
In class we had a very interesting discussion
about life after death.
I look forward to our next lesson.
|
文章內容:取自網路文章
Life After
Death
Do you believe in life after death?
Too often I find that the subject of death is addressed with
goofy speculation, close-minded stubbornness, or outright fear and avoidance.
So let's bypass the "Death for Dummies" approach and take a deeper
intellectual look at death to better understand the important role it plays in
our lives... and especially what it can teach us about how to live.
As far as our human bodies are concerned, death eventually
captures all of us. As far as I can tell, no human being has yet managed to
live forever. Even if we evolve new silicon bodies for ourselves and find a way
to transfer our minds into them, there's no reason to believe those bodies will
be immortal either (even with frequent upgrades). We may be able to delay
death, perhaps even for a very long time, but eventually our physical existence
will end at some point. Forever is too long for us to last as physical beings.
No backup system is foolproof, especially when its opponent is the infinity of
time.
On average more than 150,000 people die every day on this planet.
That's 2 people per second. Over a million corpses a week. And this is
"normal" for planet earth. Does this fact help you get some
perspective on the scope of various tragedies? If 3000 people get wiped out in
a single stroke, that's still only 2% of one day's total... hardly significant
from a cosmic point of view.
And here's the worst part. You don't even know when you'll
die (unless you're reading this right before committing suicide, in which case
I'd better keep writing). But my guess is that you don't have an item labeled
"die" on your to do list or in your tickler file.
So how comfortable do you feel with the idea that today might
be your last day alive?
For 150,000 people today, that's about to become the reality,
so if you happen to be among them, you'll have plenty of company. I wonder how
many of those people feel prepared for what awaits them.
What do we really know about what happens after death?
Instead of launching into stories about near-death
experiences and what various religions say, let's try sneaking up on this
problem from a different angle. Let's ask this question instead:
What can we reasonably say does NOT happen after death?
Obviously what's "reasonable" will differ a bit
from person to person based on his/her context and beliefs, but I think most of
us can agree on some fairly basic observations.
First, you can't take it with you. All your physical stuff
stays here. Whenever someone dies, we notice that their stuff remains in the
physical world. It doesn't suddenly vanish.
Another thing we notice is that our physical bodies stay
here. That includes our heart, lungs, brain, hemp tattoos, etc.
Also, it's fair to say that because the physical stuff stays
here, then any knowledge and skills you've developed which are rooted in the physical
world will become obsolete when you die. Your knowledge of HTML probably won't
be of much use in the afterlife, unless of course there are dead computers in
the afterlife too, such as my old Atari 800. I hope you still know BASIC.
If we manage to retain anything of ourselves after death, it
seems reasonable to say that it won't include any of our physical stuff or our
physical bodies. And much of our knowledge will be obsolete as well.
If we can take anything with us after death then, it would
have to be something non-physical in nature. And the non-physical part of
ourselves is our consciousness. You can call it other names if you wish --
soul, spirit, etc. The exact term you use doesn't really matter. I'll use the
term consciousness.
So we have a couple alternatives that seem reasonable to me:
1.After we die we retain some part of our consciousness, but
all the physical parts of our existence are lost.
2. After we die we cease to exist. Our consciousness gets
wiped out along with the physical. Dead and gone forever.
文章定位:
人氣(201) | 回應(0)| 推薦 (
0)| 收藏 (
0)|
轉寄
全站分類:
不分類