24h購物| | PChome| 登入
2007-09-20 06:34:00| 人氣537| 回應2 | 上一篇 | 下一篇

一切皆因領導者的無能無德所致

推薦 0 收藏 0 轉貼0 訂閱站台

2007. 9. 20

一個企業經營不善，或由盛而衰，或終至關門大吉，原因何在 ?

個人認為答案只有一個 : 主事者無能及/或無德，但

一般主事者都會將之歸咎於許多其他的原因，他們的說辭不外下列幾項:

1. 經濟不景氣或經濟持續衰退

2. 經營環境變化速度太快， 產業 / 生意競爭太劇烈

3. 產品生命周期已盡，再也無法扭轉趨勢

4. 工會對經營管理團隊採取不合作，甚至對抗的態度或措施

5. 所在行業或地區的員工離職率太高

6. 找不到足夠合適的人才

7. 發展或競爭策略錯誤

等等等。

    不論主事者還能舉出多少其他的理由，你若是董事會的一員，你會因此讓他繼續幹下去嗎？據我四十年來的觀察和分析，企業經營出問題，其實真正的原因只有一個，就是主事者 “無能” 及 / 或 “無德”。

    一個領導者，本就是被請來解決上列問題的，怎能反過來，將它們拿來當經營不善或失敗的藉口? 若因無法獲得經營管理必須的資源, 當初即不應接受該項職務, 或於中途即應求去, 而不該茍且等到名譽受損.
    企業主事者無能無德，董事會視若無睹或無動於衷，讓他們繼續幹下去，大約只有兩個理由: 一是董事會成員瀆職，二是找不到較現任主事者能幹之人。

    而無論是何者，結局無須太高的IQ，隨便誰也猜得出來，因在競爭如此劇烈的商場上，絕無天方夜譚式的奇蹟會發生。

    總之，主事者對所領導的企業營運失敗，甚至將之帶向衰亡之途，所做的一切辯解，全是他們無能無德的遁詞。此道理適用於所有人類組織的領導者，包括國家的領袖在內。

    不幸的是，負責監督領導者的機構的成員，如企業董事會的董監事，民意代表，甚至人民自身，大部分都很容易被主事者的遁詞所矇騙，而讓他們繼續鬼混，直到情況不可收拾為止。

    可是等到那一刻，一切悔恨，俱晚矣!

我要檢舉
台長： CT

您可能對以下文章有興趣

人氣(537) | 回應(2)| 推薦 (0)| 收藏 (0)| 轉寄
全站分類: 不分類 | 個人分類: 漫談企業經營管理 |
此分類下一篇:企業領導者應注意的 "小事" --- 之一
此分類上一篇:Charles Handy vs. Peter Drucker

我要回應
moonchen
The first one to roll is Chairman & CEO for company failure. I have seen many well-known CEOs quit immediately, not waiting till pressures from the corporation board. Generally, corporation chairman in Taiwan is the owner of the corporation, no one can move him or her from his or her position. That`s the disaster where comes from. anyway.
2007-09-21 14:54:04
版主回應
I am in full agreement to your comment on
the problem of having a CEO being the Chairman at some corporations in Taiwan.
2007-09-22 08:29:08
TaHsun
Kindly to ask the major responsbility difference (your opinion) between COO and CEO ? Some companies use COO and else buy in CEO in Taiwan.
2007-10-01 15:28:44
版主回應
COO and CEO are terminology borrowed from Western countries, where in some cases, COO (Chief Operating Officer) and CEO (Chief Executive Officer) are almost the same in
terms of the responsibilities, but in some large scaled corporations, CEO may mean the highest executive position in the organization while COO takes care only the functions relating to the manufacturing section of the corporation.

CEO could be acting as the Chairman, but I did not seem to have seen the cases where COO acts as the Chairman concurently.

In my opinion there are no definite division between the two terms. It all depends on how the Board of Directors of a company defines them.

In Taiwan, I really don`t know what the differences are between CEO and COO that some local companies have chose to use. You
probably need to look at what the Chinese
translation to get some ideas.
2007-10-01 18:47:06
否 是 (若未登入"個人新聞台帳號"則看不到回覆唷!)
* 請輸入識別碼：
請輸入圖片中算式的結果(可能為0) 
(有*為必填)
TOP
詳全文