A fundamental overhaul of global environmental
governance is needed now to avoid dangerous "tipping points" in the
Earth system, 32 social scientists and researchers from around the world
conclude in a new paper published Friday in the journal "Science."
These conclusions are reinforced by a new 40-year-outlook report just
issued by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development,
OECD, whose 34 members include the world's largest economies.
Sharp increases in natural disasters, food and water security
problems, biodiversity loss and climate change are just part of the
evidence that humanity may be crossing planetary boundaries and
approaching points of no return, called tipping points, write 32 leading
governance experts from the Earth System Governance research alliance
in their "Science" article.
To reduce the risk of global environmental disaster, they say a
"constitutional moment" in world politics is required, comparable in
scale and importance to the reform of international governance that
followed World War II.
Lead author Frank Biermann, of Free University Amsterdam and Lund
University, Sweden, said, "Societies must change course to steer away
from critical tipping points in the Earth system that could lead to
rapid and irreversible change. Incremental change is no longer
sufficient to bring about societal change at the level and with the
speed needed to stop Earth system transformation."
"Structural change in global governance is needed, both inside and
outside the UN system and involving both public and private actors,"
said Biermann, who also is chair of the scientific steering committee of
the Earth System Governance Project.
The paper is a key contribution of the science community to the 2012
United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development, Rio+20 slated from
June 20-22 in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. This gathering follows up on the
Earth Summit in Rio in 1992.
"Science assessments indicate that human activities are moving
several of Earth's sub-systems outside the range of natural variability
typical for the previous 500,000 years," wrote the authors in the
opening of their article, "Navigating the Anthropocene: Improving Earth
System Governance."
The research group argues for the creation of a UN Sustainable
Development Council to better integrate sustainable development concerns
across the UN system, with a strong role for the 20 largest economies,
the G20. They supports upgrading the UN Environment Programme to a
full-fledged UN agency, a status that would give it greater authority,
more secure funding, and facilitate the creation and enforcement of
international regulations and standards.
Stronger consultative rights for representatives of civil society in
global governance are needed, based on mechanisms that balance
differences in influence and resources among civil society
representatives, these experts recommend.
To improve the speed of decision-making in international
negotiations, the authors called for stronger reliance on qualified
majority voting.
"There has to be a change in international negotiating procedures
from the current situation, in which no action can be taken unless
consensus is reached among all participating governments," said
contributing author Kenneth Abbott, a professor of international
relations in Arizona State University's Sandra Day O'Connor College of
Law.
The authors also called for governments "to close remaining
regulatory gaps at the global level," including the treatment of
emerging technologies.
"A great deal of attention has been given to issues such as climate
change, yet nanotechnology and other emerging technologies, which may
bring significant benefits, also carry potential risks for sustainable
development," warned Abbott.
The research group also argues for increased financial support for
poorer nations, writing, "More substantial financial resources could be
made available through novel financial mechanisms, such as global
emissions markets or air transportation levies for sustainability
purposes."
"Working to make the world economy more green and to create an
effective institutional framework for sustainable development will be
the two main focal points at this summer's United Nations Conference on
Sustainable Development in Rio de Janeiro, “Abbott said. " This article
was written to bring urgency to those discussions and to outline
specific building blocks for a more effective and sustainable Earth
system governance system."
These conclusions are supported by the "OECD Environmental Outlook to
2050: The Consequences of Inaction" presents the latest projections of
socio-economic trends over the next four decades, and their implications
for four key areas of concern: climate change, biodiversity, water and
the health impacts of environmental pollution.
Despite the recent recession, the global economy is projected to
nearly quadruple to 2050. Rising living standards will be accompanied by
ever growing demands for energy, food and natural resources - and more
pollution.
"Greener sources of growth can help governments today as they tackle
these pressing challenges. Greening agriculture, water and energy supply
and manufacturing will be critical by 2050 to meet the needs of over
nine billion people," said OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurria.
"The costs of inaction could be colossal, both in economic and human terms," the OECD warned.
Without new policies, the OECD report warns:
- World energy demand in 2050 will be 80 percent higher, with most of
the growth to come from emerging economies and still 85 percent reliant
on fossil fuel-based energy. This could lead to a 50 percent increase in
greenhouse gas emissions globally and worsening air pollution. Energy
demand for North America is projected to increase about +15 percent, for
OECD Europe +28 percent, for Japan +2.5, and for Mexico +112 percent.
- Urban air pollution is set to become the top environmental cause of
mortality worldwide by 2050, ahead of dirty water and lack of
sanitation. The number of premature deaths from exposure to particulate
air pollutants leading to respiratory failure could double from current
levels to 3.6 million every year globally, with most occurring in China
and India. Because of their ageing and urbanized populations, OECD
countries are likely to have a high rate of premature death from
ground-level ozone in 2050, second only to India.
- On land, global biodiversity is projected to decline by a further 10
percent, with significant losses in Asia, Europe and Southern Africa.
Areas of mature forests are projected to shrink by 13 percent. About
one-third of biodiversity in rivers and lakes worldwide has already been
lost, and further losses are projected to 2050.
- Global water demand will increase by some 55 percent, due to growing
demand from manufacturing (+400 percent), thermal power plants (+140
percent) and domestic use (+130 percent). These competing demands will
put water use by farmers at risk. The OECD report projects that 2.3
billion more people than today - over 40 percent of the global
population - will be living in river basins under severe water stress,
especially in North and South Africa, and South and Central Asia.