24h購物| | PChome| 登入
2006-11-01 00:13:07| 人氣17| 回應0 | 上一篇 | 下一篇

d statment

推薦 0 收藏 0 轉貼0 訂閱站台

Having sex with anyone is a basic human right. Therefore, sex at any age, under any circumstances should be made legally permissible as long as there is a genuine mutual consent among those who are involved. Setting an age limit is discriminatory, because this deprives the minor of the right of enjoying sex—even if they are not considered “mature” by the norms of our society. In fact, maturity comes from education, not from age along. By setting an age of consent at 18, we marginalize those who may have already become mature enough to have sex at a much younger age. Even just using the notion of maturity as a demarcation line is problematic, because maturity is a socially constructed barrier imposed upon our children. And if age should not be a preventing factor, other forms of sexual taboos should also be abolished as well, including adultery, prostitution, and incest.

People search for true love, soul mates, etc are in fact just looking for a sexual partner, because the only thing that distinguishes romantic love from other kinds of love relationship is the leverage of having sex. All love relationships have elements of affection, intimacy, and/or passion, but only romantic love gives people the social premium of have sex with others. “Soul mates” is a hugely mistaken notion, because the very idea of having a “soul” relies on having a body—at least from what we know scientifically. In any rate, “soul mates” should be termed as “body mates.” Soul mates do not have their “souls” any more special than the “souls” of our parents or children. It is their body, or rather, the social approval of using their physical organs to generate physical pleasure that distinguish them from the rest of our loves ones. In essence, romantic love can be more accurately described as “sex love,” because what makes the love relationship romantic is none other than sex.

Heaven is not a good place to live in, because its family structure is an inconceivably perverse polygyny. The Great Patriarch—Jehovah, is the sole breadwinner and has an extremely concentrated power that’s impossible to challenge. Upon joining the family in heaven, status such parents/children, wives/husbands, girlfriends/boyfriends become irrelevant because love will be distributed equally among everyone. In effect, one loses one’s biological parents and children because in heaven they all become equal lovers. There is only one single marriage exists in heaven: the marriage between God and everyone else. By choosing to obey His commandments and serve Him with total submissiveness, every human being in heaven participates in the cult of true womanhood, as their existences become meaningful by their willingness to please the Patriarch. This creates a de facto polygyny within which egalitarian beliefs are impossible to foster because of the dominant ideology, and within which the brides have no power to protest or dissent on their own behalf.

台長: Comfort
人氣(17) | 回應(0)| 推薦 (0)| 收藏 (0)| 轉寄
全站分類: 圖文創作(詩詞、散文、小說、懷舊、插畫)

是 (若未登入"個人新聞台帳號"則看不到回覆唷!)
* 請輸入識別碼:
請輸入圖片中算式的結果(可能為0) 
(有*為必填)
TOP
詳全文